PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-6.85%
Revenue decline while SAND shows 27.63% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-4.90%
Cost reduction while SAND shows 15.13% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-8.30%
Gross profit decline while SAND shows 38.49% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-1.55%
Margin decline while SAND shows 8.51% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-55.96%
G&A reduction while SAND shows 32.18% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
131.63%
Other expenses growth above 1.5x SAND's 61.71%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
-55.96%
Operating expenses reduction while SAND shows 21.08% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-12.07%
Total costs reduction while SAND shows 16.48% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-20.61%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-1.33%
D&A reduction while SAND shows 10.51% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-2.04%
EBITDA decline while SAND shows 28.70% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
7.32%
EBITDA margin growth exceeding 1.5x SAND's 0.83%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-1.75%
Operating income decline while SAND shows 44.12% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
5.48%
Operating margin growth below 50% of SAND's 12.92%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
74.66%
Other expenses growth 50-75% of SAND's 115.89%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine cost efficiency.
0.88%
Pre-tax income growth below 50% of SAND's 52.56%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
8.30%
Pre-tax margin growth below 50% of SAND's 19.54%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-14030.23%
Tax expense reduction while SAND shows 38.26% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
4.90%
Net income growth below 50% of SAND's 61.15%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
12.62%
Net margin growth below 50% of SAND's 26.26%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
6.06%
EPS growth below 50% of SAND's 83.33%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
6.06%
Diluted EPS growth below 50% of SAND's 83.33%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
0.09%
Share count change of 0.09% while SAND is stable. Bruce Berkowitz would verify approach.
-0.31%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.