PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
13.24%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x SAND's 4.38%. David Dodd would verify if faster growth reflects superior business model.
19.83%
Similar cost growth to SAND's 22.66%. Walter Schloss would investigate if industry cost pressures are temporary.
8.19%
Positive growth while SAND shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-4.46%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
16.98%
G&A growth while SAND reduces overhead. John Neff would investigate operational differences.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-99.04%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
22.04%
Operating expenses growth while SAND reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
19.98%
Total costs growth 1.1-1.25x SAND's 16.57%. Bill Ackman would demand justification.
-88.07%
Interest expense reduction while SAND shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
18.16%
Similar D&A growth to SAND's 16.96%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry patterns.
10.10%
EBITDA growth while SAND declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-3.64%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
7.00%
Operating income growth while SAND declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-5.51%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-23.87%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
6.85%
Pre-tax income growth while SAND declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-5.65%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
91.74%
Tax expense growth while SAND reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
3.04%
Net income growth while SAND declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-9.01%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
2.86%
EPS growth while SAND declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
2.86%
Diluted EPS growth while SAND declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.