PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
1.94%
Positive growth while SAND shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-0.14%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
3.70%
Positive growth while SAND shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
1.73%
Margin expansion exceeding 1.5x SAND's 0.97%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
68.08%
G&A growth above 1.5x SAND's 6.72%. Michael Burry would check for operational inefficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
42650.00%
Other expenses growth above 1.5x SAND's 40.71%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
61.11%
Operating expenses growth 1.1-1.25x SAND's 50.01%. Bill Ackman would demand justification.
4.24%
Total costs growth while SAND reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
417.94%
Interest expense growth above 1.5x SAND's 37.19%. Michael Burry would check for over-leverage.
-1.41%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
0.17%
EBITDA growth below 50% of SAND's 3.15%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-0.08%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-0.01%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-1.91%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
221.93%
Similar other expenses growth to SAND's 283.36%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry patterns.
2.31%
Pre-tax income growth below 50% of SAND's 44.90%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
0.37%
Pre-tax margin growth below 50% of SAND's 69.84%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-76.49%
Tax expense reduction while SAND shows 10.13% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
2.54%
Net income growth below 50% of SAND's 73.80%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
0.60%
Net margin growth below 50% of SAND's 103.71%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
2.78%
EPS growth below 50% of SAND's 33.33%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
2.78%
Diluted EPS growth below 50% of SAND's 33.33%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
0.13%
Share count increase while SAND reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
0.13%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of SAND's 0.14%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.