PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
3.44%
Revenue growth below 50% of SAND's 8.06%. Michael Burry would check for competitive disadvantage risks.
8.53%
Cost increase while SAND reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
-0.52%
Gross profit decline while SAND shows 16.25% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-3.82%
Margin decline while SAND shows 7.58% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
16.95%
G&A growth less than half of SAND's 34.49%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is structural.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
828.79%
Other expenses growth while SAND reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
16.40%
Operating expenses growth 50-75% of SAND's 30.09%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine efficiency.
9.27%
Total costs growth above 1.5x SAND's 5.38%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
-6.67%
Interest expense reduction while SAND shows 31.60% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
8.26%
D&A growth while SAND reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
5.99%
EBITDA growth exceeding 1.5x SAND's 2.84%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
1.14%
EBITDA margin growth while SAND declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
3.37%
Operating income growth below 50% of SAND's 11.41%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-0.07%
Operating margin decline while SAND shows 3.10% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
183.39%
Other expenses growth while SAND reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
116.08%
Pre-tax income growth exceeding 1.5x SAND's 5.65%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
108.90%
Pre-tax margin growth while SAND declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
58.43%
Tax expense growth while SAND reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
116.27%
Net income growth exceeding 1.5x SAND's 11.67%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
109.08%
Net margin growth exceeding 1.5x SAND's 3.34%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
116.67%
EPS growth exceeding 1.5x SAND's 26.67%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
116.67%
Diluted EPS growth exceeding 1.5x SAND's 26.67%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.