PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
10.44%
Revenue growth 50-75% of SAND's 18.59%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize if slower growth is temporary.
-0.10%
Cost reduction while SAND shows 36.04% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
19.36%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x SAND's 6.75%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
8.08%
Margin expansion while SAND shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
38.24%
G&A growth while SAND reduces overhead. John Neff would investigate operational differences.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-18.30%
Other expenses reduction while SAND shows 650.53% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
36.32%
Operating expenses growth while SAND reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
3.54%
Total costs growth less than half of SAND's 21.06%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
-7.14%
Interest expense reduction while SAND shows 3.29% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-1.86%
D&A reduction while SAND shows 34.64% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
8.75%
EBITDA growth below 50% of SAND's 26.37%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-1.90%
EBITDA margin decline while SAND shows 4.47% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
12.09%
Operating income growth 50-75% of SAND's 18.13%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
1.49%
Operating margin growth while SAND declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-176.76%
Other expenses reduction while SAND shows 72.51% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-45.94%
Pre-tax income decline while SAND shows 19.57% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-51.05%
Pre-tax margin decline while SAND shows 0.83% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-2.19%
Tax expense reduction while SAND shows 12.47% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-46.04%
Net income decline while SAND shows 23.61% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-51.14%
Net margin decline while SAND shows 4.23% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-46.15%
EPS decline while SAND shows 25.26% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-46.15%
Diluted EPS decline while SAND shows 23.42% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
0.13%
Share count reduction below 50% of SAND's 0.20%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
0.05%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of SAND's 0.09%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.