PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-1.41%
Revenue decline while SAND shows 1.71% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
10.38%
Cost increase while SAND reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
-9.76%
Gross profit decline while SAND shows 3.88% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-8.47%
Margin decline while SAND shows 2.14% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-44.46%
G&A reduction while SAND shows 86.42% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.76%
Other expenses growth 50-75% of SAND's 190.25%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine cost efficiency.
-41.50%
Operating expenses reduction while SAND shows 126.49% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
3.56%
Total costs growth less than half of SAND's 24.47%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
-7.69%
Interest expense reduction while SAND shows 15.76% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
11.99%
D&A growth while SAND reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
-1.34%
EBITDA decline while SAND shows 113.99% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
0.02%
EBITDA margin growth while SAND declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-6.19%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-4.85%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
64.26%
Other expenses growth less than half of SAND's 9476.18%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
-5.60%
Pre-tax income decline while SAND shows 219.71% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-4.26%
Pre-tax margin decline while SAND shows 214.35% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-70.04%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-5.33%
Net income decline while SAND shows 334.26% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-3.98%
Net margin decline while SAND shows 326.98% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-5.71%
EPS decline while SAND shows 341.18% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-5.71%
Diluted EPS decline while SAND shows 326.44% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
0.14%
Share count reduction below 50% of SAND's 0.16%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
0.09%
Diluted share reduction exceeding 1.5x SAND's 0.29%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.