PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-27.76%
Revenue decline while SAND shows 8.29% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-17.03%
Cost reduction while SAND shows 55.60% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-37.06%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-12.87%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-23.88%
Both companies reducing G&A. Martin Whitman would check industry cost trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-44.11%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-25.29%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-17.64%
Total costs reduction while SAND shows 16.58% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-8.33%
Interest expense reduction while SAND shows 790.65% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-19.14%
D&A reduction while SAND shows 54.99% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
15.65%
EBITDA growth while SAND declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-3.73%
EBITDA margin decline while SAND shows 20.65% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-31.50%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-5.18%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
18698.59%
Other expenses growth while SAND reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
39.65%
Pre-tax income growth while SAND declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
93.31%
Pre-tax margin growth while SAND declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
5873.13%
Tax expense growth while SAND reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
31.79%
Net income growth while SAND declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
82.42%
Net margin growth while SAND declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
30.30%
EPS growth while SAND declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
30.30%
Diluted EPS growth while SAND declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
0.05%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x SAND's 25.96%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
0.01%
Diluted share reduction exceeding 1.5x SAND's 25.26%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.