PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-9.14%
Revenue decline while SAND shows 14.39% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-15.59%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
-3.04%
Gross profit decline while SAND shows 45.89% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
6.72%
Margin expansion below 50% of SAND's 27.54%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
6.88%
G&A growth less than half of SAND's 19.48%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is structural.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1449.59%
Other expenses growth less than half of SAND's 3478.85%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
3.79%
Operating expenses growth less than half of SAND's 76.94%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
-13.11%
Total costs reduction while SAND shows 6.58% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
7152.63%
Interest expense growth above 1.5x SAND's 4.75%. Michael Burry would check for over-leverage.
-15.34%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-30.43%
EBITDA decline while SAND shows 51.58% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
4.90%
EBITDA margin growth below 50% of SAND's 32.52%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-1.06%
Operating income decline while SAND shows 201.73% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
8.89%
Operating margin growth below 50% of SAND's 163.78%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-88.56%
Other expenses reduction while SAND shows 11.03% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-31.83%
Pre-tax income decline while SAND shows 1266.09% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-24.97%
Pre-tax margin decline while SAND shows 1094.28% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
46.81%
Tax expense growth while SAND reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
-32.95%
Net income decline while SAND shows 857.69% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-26.20%
Net margin decline while SAND shows 762.40% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-32.43%
EPS decline while SAND shows 859.42% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-32.43%
Diluted EPS decline while SAND shows 853.62% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
0.07%
Share count increase while SAND reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
0.08%
Diluted share reduction exceeding 1.5x SAND's 0.81%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.