PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
23.55%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x SAND's 13.32%. David Dodd would verify if faster growth reflects superior business model.
16.66%
Cost growth 1.25-1.5x SAND's 11.41%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize competitive cost position.
29.24%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x SAND's 15.72%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
4.60%
Margin expansion exceeding 1.5x SAND's 2.12%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-18.96%
Both companies reducing G&A. Martin Whitman would check industry cost trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-96.13%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-15.98%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
11.67%
Total costs growth 1.25-1.5x SAND's 9.20%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize control.
-97.39%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
22.44%
Similar D&A growth to SAND's 22.26%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry patterns.
42.01%
EBITDA growth while SAND declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
5.39%
EBITDA margin growth while SAND declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
37.10%
Operating income growth while SAND declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
10.97%
Operating margin growth while SAND declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
99.98%
Other expenses growth while SAND reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
40.81%
Pre-tax income growth while SAND declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
13.97%
Pre-tax margin growth while SAND declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
193.24%
Tax expense growth while SAND reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
26.98%
Net income growth while SAND declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
2.78%
Net margin growth while SAND declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
28.00%
EPS growth while SAND declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
28.00%
Diluted EPS growth while SAND declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
0.12%
Share count increase while SAND reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
0.09%
Diluted share increase while SAND reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.