95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-15.79%
Both companies show declining revenue. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide issues.
-14.92%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
-16.44%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-0.77%
Margin decline while SAND shows 9.53% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-11.84%
Both companies reducing G&A. Martin Whitman would check industry cost trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-692.49%
Other expenses reduction while SAND shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-11.96%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-14.58%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
116.67%
Interest expense growth while SAND reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-16.90%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-22.16%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
0.91%
EBITDA margin growth while SAND declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-17.01%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-1.45%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-24.80%
Other expenses reduction while SAND shows 10.51% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-17.66%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-2.23%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-16.14%
Tax expense reduction while SAND shows 151.36% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-17.73%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-2.30%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-21.88%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-21.88%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
0.02%
Share count increase while SAND reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
-0.01%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.