PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
44.37%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x SAND's 10.66%. David Dodd would verify if faster growth reflects superior business model.
45.91%
Cost growth above 1.5x SAND's 20.27%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
43.20%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x SAND's 0.79%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-0.81%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
22.26%
Similar G&A growth to SAND's 20.87%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry cost structures.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-210.66%
Other expenses reduction while SAND shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
22.30%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x SAND's 8.80%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
43.11%
Total costs growth above 1.5x SAND's 18.11%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
-2.56%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
53.28%
D&A growth above 1.5x SAND's 25.32%. Michael Burry would check for excessive investment.
50.51%
EBITDA growth below 50% of SAND's 134.15%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-3.13%
EBITDA margin decline while SAND shows 4.75% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
47.82%
Operating income growth exceeding 1.5x SAND's 6.98%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
2.39%
Operating margin growth while SAND declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-107.84%
Other expenses reduction while SAND shows 200.49% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
39.66%
Pre-tax income growth below 50% of SAND's 5381.27%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-3.26%
Pre-tax margin decline while SAND shows 4853.39% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-165.63%
Tax expense reduction while SAND shows 729.17% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
44.74%
Net income growth below 50% of SAND's 10157.68%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
0.26%
Net margin growth below 50% of SAND's 9189.06%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
52.00%
EPS growth below 50% of SAND's 10562.50%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
52.00%
Diluted EPS growth below 50% of SAND's 10375.00%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
0.01%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x SAND's 0.50%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
0.02%
Diluted share reduction exceeding 1.5x SAND's 2.30%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.