PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-8.27%
Both companies show declining revenue. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide issues.
-10.98%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
-6.18%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
2.28%
Similar margin change to SAND's 3.01%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry pricing power.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-28.10%
Both companies reducing G&A. Martin Whitman would check industry cost trends.
140.62%
Marketing expense growth while SAND reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
70.89%
Other expenses change of 70.89% while SAND maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
-28.25%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-12.73%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-2.63%
Interest expense reduction while SAND shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-9.99%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-5.57%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
2.65%
EBITDA margin growth while SAND declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-4.08%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
4.58%
Operating margin growth exceeding 1.5x SAND's 2.57%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
888.96%
Other expenses growth while SAND reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-3.79%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
4.89%
Pre-tax margin growth while SAND declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
99.20%
Tax expense growth while SAND reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
-2.61%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
6.18%
Net margin growth while SAND declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-5.26%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-5.26%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
0.02%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x SAND's 0.05%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
0.01%
Diluted share increase while SAND reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.