PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
1.19%
Positive growth while SAND shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-9.45%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
9.00%
Gross profit growth 50-75% of SAND's 12.46%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize competitive position.
7.71%
Margin expansion below 50% of SAND's 15.87%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-9.61%
G&A reduction while SAND shows 22.83% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
375.31%
Marketing expense growth above 1.5x SAND's 7.20%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
3913.82%
Other expenses growth above 1.5x SAND's 464.95%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
42.05%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x SAND's 6.53%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
-4.63%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-2.70%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-7.09%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
0.21%
EBITDA growth below 50% of SAND's 20.67%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
1.52%
EBITDA margin growth 1.25-1.5x SAND's 1.03%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
6.22%
Operating income growth 50-75% of SAND's 10.84%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
4.96%
Operating margin growth below 50% of SAND's 14.20%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-33.56%
Other expenses reduction while SAND shows 86.93% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
5.85%
Pre-tax income growth below 50% of SAND's 2165.62%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
4.60%
Pre-tax margin growth below 50% of SAND's 2228.25%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
188027.38%
Tax expense growth while SAND reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
-25.44%
Net income decline while SAND shows 340.06% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-26.31%
Net margin decline while SAND shows 347.34% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-25.00%
EPS decline while SAND shows 340.71% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-25.00%
Diluted EPS decline while SAND shows 338.57% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
0.07%
Share count reduction below 50% of SAND's 0.01%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
0.10%
Diluted share reduction exceeding 1.5x SAND's 0.67%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.