PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
3.09%
Revenue growth below 50% of SAND's 8.06%. Michael Burry would check for competitive disadvantage risks.
-2.08%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
6.25%
Gross profit growth below 50% of SAND's 15.07%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
3.06%
Margin expansion below 50% of SAND's 6.49%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
87.23%
G&A growth while SAND reduces overhead. John Neff would investigate operational differences.
-100.00%
Both companies reducing marketing spend. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-95.20%
Other expenses reduction while SAND shows 638.91% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
33.07%
Operating expenses growth less than half of SAND's 367.21%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
1.73%
Total costs growth less than half of SAND's 77.50%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
-1.39%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-5.61%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
4.01%
EBITDA growth while SAND declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
0.89%
EBITDA margin growth while SAND declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
4.11%
Operating income growth while SAND declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
0.98%
Operating margin growth while SAND declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
62.20%
Other expenses growth less than half of SAND's 477.69%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
5.39%
Pre-tax income growth while SAND declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
2.23%
Pre-tax margin growth while SAND declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-45.54%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
26.42%
Net income growth while SAND declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
22.63%
Net margin growth while SAND declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
25.93%
EPS growth while SAND declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
25.93%
Diluted EPS growth while SAND declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
0.05%
Share count increase while SAND reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
0.04%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of SAND's 0.03%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.