PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
23.62%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x SAND's 5.62%. David Dodd would verify if faster growth reflects superior business model.
135.58%
Cost growth above 1.5x SAND's 7.54%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
0.89%
Gross profit growth below 50% of SAND's 4.28%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-18.39%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
139.26%
G&A growth while SAND reduces overhead. John Neff would investigate operational differences.
-100.00%
Marketing expense reduction while SAND shows 100.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
-98.02%
Other expenses reduction while SAND shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-85.70%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-31.64%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-93.52%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
11.28%
D&A growth while SAND reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
92.10%
EBITDA growth exceeding 1.5x SAND's 27.57%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
55.39%
EBITDA margin growth exceeding 1.5x SAND's 20.78%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
147.14%
Operating income growth exceeding 1.5x SAND's 17.09%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
99.91%
Operating margin growth exceeding 1.5x SAND's 10.86%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-21.40%
Other expenses reduction while SAND shows 47.82% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
136.74%
Pre-tax income growth 1.25-1.5x SAND's 122.09%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
91.50%
Similar pre-tax margin growth to SAND's 110.26%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry trends.
14.97%
Tax expense growth 50-75% of SAND's 28.37%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine efficiency.
188.14%
Similar net income growth to SAND's 243.04%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry trends.
133.07%
Net margin growth 50-75% of SAND's 224.78%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
194.74%
EPS growth 50-75% of SAND's 300.00%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
194.74%
Diluted EPS growth 50-75% of SAND's 292.16%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
0.01%
Share count increase while SAND reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
0.01%
Diluted share reduction exceeding 1.5x SAND's 0.97%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.