95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Highlights the firm's ability to meet near-term obligations and cover interest expenses. For conservative value investors, strong liquidity and coverage metrics are critical to avoid distress or forced dilution.
2.00
Below 0.5x FSM's 4.05. Michael Burry might see potential near-term liquidity strain.
2.00
0.5–0.75x FSM's 3.43. Martin Whitman might be concerned about coverage if a crisis hits.
1.86
Similar ratio to FSM's 1.78. Walter Schloss would see both following standard liquidity practices.
82.73
Coverage above 1.5x FSM's 34.60. David Dodd would confirm minimal interest risk in contrast to competitor.
83.21
Short-term coverage of 83.21 while FSM has zero coverage. Bruce Berkowitz would examine if our cash flow management provides advantages.