PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Highlights the firm's ability to meet near-term obligations and cover interest expenses. For conservative value investors, strong liquidity and coverage metrics are critical to avoid distress or forced dilution.
2.07
0.5–0.75x NEM's 2.97. Martin Whitman would question if short-term obligations are sufficiently covered.
2.07
Similar ratio to NEM's 2.22. Walter Schloss might see both running close to industry norms.
2.02
Similar ratio to NEM's 1.95. Walter Schloss would see both following standard liquidity practices.
5.09
Coverage 0.75–0.9x NEM's 6.14. Bill Ackman would push for better earnings or reduced debt load.
-2.48
Negative short-term coverage while NEM shows 0.91. Joel Greenblatt would look for cash flow improvements and refinancing catalysts.