PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Highlights the firm's ability to meet near-term obligations and cover interest expenses. For conservative value investors, strong liquidity and coverage metrics are critical to avoid distress or forced dilution.
2.51
0.5–0.75x RGLD's 3.49. Martin Whitman would question if short-term obligations are sufficiently covered.
2.51
0.75–0.9x RGLD's 3.20. Bill Ackman would recommend finding ways to boost near-cash assets or reduce short-term liabilities.
2.43
Similar ratio to RGLD's 2.51. Walter Schloss would see both following standard liquidity practices.
13.21
Positive interest coverage while RGLD shows negative coverage. John Neff would examine our debt service advantages in a challenging market.
2557.96
Short-term coverage of 2557.96 while RGLD has zero coverage. Bruce Berkowitz would examine if our cash flow management provides advantages.