95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Profitability reveals how effectively the business turns revenues into profits. Higher and improving margins or returns on capital suggest a durable competitive advantage, supporting a stronger intrinsic valuation.
-2.44%
Negative ROE while FSM stands at 1.67%. Joel Greenblatt would investigate capital misallocation or uncompetitive positioning.
-2.00%
Negative ROA while FSM stands at 1.25%. John Neff would check for structural inefficiencies or mispriced assets.
-1.79%
Negative ROCE while FSM is at 2.12%. Joel Greenblatt would look for capital misallocation or cyclical downturn.
35.42%
Similar gross margin to FSM's 33.84%. Walter Schloss would check if both companies have comparable cost structures.
-58.62%
Negative operating margin while FSM has 23.14%. Joel Greenblatt would demand urgent improvements in cost or revenue.
-65.81%
Negative net margin while FSM has 15.14%. Joel Greenblatt would check if uncompetitive pricing or bloated costs cause losses.