95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Profitability reveals how effectively the business turns revenues into profits. Higher and improving margins or returns on capital suggest a durable competitive advantage, supporting a stronger intrinsic valuation.
-5.62%
Negative ROE while NEM stands at 0.14%. Joel Greenblatt would investigate capital misallocation or uncompetitive positioning.
-3.92%
Negative ROA while NEM stands at 0.06%. John Neff would check for structural inefficiencies or mispriced assets.
0.08%
Positive ROCE while NEM is negative. John Neff would see if competitive strategy explains the difference.
12.77%
Gross margin below 50% of NEM's 38.30%. Michael Burry would watch for cost or pricing crises.
2.67%
Positive operating margin while NEM is negative. John Neff might see a significant competitive edge in operations.
-134.45%
Negative net margin while NEM has 0.75%. Joel Greenblatt would check if uncompetitive pricing or bloated costs cause losses.