95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Profitability reveals how effectively the business turns revenues into profits. Higher and improving margins or returns on capital suggest a durable competitive advantage, supporting a stronger intrinsic valuation.
-46.29%
Negative ROE while SAND stands at 1.08%. Joel Greenblatt would investigate capital misallocation or uncompetitive positioning.
-44.57%
Negative ROA while SAND stands at 0.85%. John Neff would check for structural inefficiencies or mispriced assets.
-17.03%
Negative ROCE while SAND is at 1.44%. Joel Greenblatt would look for capital misallocation or cyclical downturn.
100.00%
Gross margin above 1.5x SAND's 64.38%. David Dodd would assess whether superior technology or brand is driving this.
23.41%
Operating margin below 50% of SAND's 50.60%. Michael Burry would investigate whether this signals deeper issues.
63.64%
Net margin above 1.5x SAND's 30.06%. David Dodd would investigate if product mix or brand premium drives better bottom line.