95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
These metrics indicate whether the stock trades cheaply or expensively relative to its fundamentals. Value investors use them to find mispricings—buying stocks that appear undervalued, with solid long-term prospects and limited downside risk.
31.04
P/E less than half of AEM's 83.95. Charlie Munger would verify if competitive advantages justify such a discount.
70.84
Similar P/S to AEM's 78.51. David Dodd would investigate if similar multiples reflect similar business quality.
4.26
Similar P/B to AEM's 4.57. Philip Fisher would investigate if similar multiples reflect similar asset efficiency.
104.80
Positive FCF while AEM shows negative FCF. John Neff would investigate cash generation advantage.
104.80
P/OCF 50-75% of AEM's 180.36. Bruce Berkowitz would examine if working capital management explains the gap.
4.26
Similar fair value ratio to AEM's 4.57. Walter Schloss would investigate if similar valuations reflect similar quality.
0.81%
Earnings yield exceeding 1.5x AEM's 0.30%. David Dodd would verify if earnings quality justifies this premium.
0.95%
Positive FCF while AEM shows negative FCF. John Neff would investigate cash generation advantage.