95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
These metrics indicate whether the stock trades cheaply or expensively relative to its fundamentals. Value investors use them to find mispricings—buying stocks that appear undervalued, with solid long-term prospects and limited downside risk.
-12.66
Negative P/E while AEM shows 1062.41. Joel Greenblatt would examine path to profitability versus competitor.
31.69
P/S above 1.5x AEM's 10.81. Michael Burry would check for mean reversion risks.
1.12
Similar P/B to AEM's 1.32. Philip Fisher would investigate if similar multiples reflect similar asset efficiency.
49.06
P/FCF less than half of AEM's 258.35. David Dodd would verify if cash flow quality justifies this discount.
48.79
P/OCF 1.25-1.5x AEM's 38.27. Martin Whitman would scrutinize if premium reflects better business model.
1.12
Similar fair value ratio to AEM's 1.32. Walter Schloss would investigate if similar valuations reflect similar quality.
-1.98%
Negative earnings while AEM shows yield of 0.02%. Joel Greenblatt would examine path to profitability.
2.04%
FCF yield exceeding 1.5x AEM's 0.39%. David Dodd would verify if cash flow quality justifies this premium.