PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
These metrics indicate whether the stock trades cheaply or expensively relative to its fundamentals. Value investors use them to find mispricings—buying stocks that appear undervalued, with solid long-term prospects and limited downside risk.
7.68
P/E less than half of AEM's 536.53. Charlie Munger would verify if competitive advantages justify such a discount.
46.03
P/S above 1.5x AEM's 19.18. Michael Burry would check for mean reversion risks.
1.87
Similar P/B to AEM's 2.16. Philip Fisher would investigate if similar multiples reflect similar asset efficiency.
-20.40
Both companies show negative FCF. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide capital intensity issues.
72.31
Similar P/OCF to AEM's 88.86. Walter Schloss would investigate if similar multiples reflect similar business quality.
1.87
Similar fair value ratio to AEM's 2.16. Walter Schloss would investigate if similar valuations reflect similar quality.
3.25%
Earnings yield exceeding 1.5x AEM's 0.05%. David Dodd would verify if earnings quality justifies this premium.
-4.90%
Both companies show negative FCF. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide capital intensity issues.