PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
These metrics indicate whether the stock trades cheaply or expensively relative to its fundamentals. Value investors use them to find mispricings—buying stocks that appear undervalued, with solid long-term prospects and limited downside risk.
35.70
Positive P/E while PAAS shows losses. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
76.54
P/S above 1.5x PAAS's 37.57. Michael Burry would check for mean reversion risks.
4.96
P/B 50-75% of PAAS's 6.68. Bruce Berkowitz would examine if asset composition explains the gap.
-8.50
Both companies show negative FCF. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide capital intensity issues.
141.96
P/OCF 50-75% of PAAS's 228.64. Bruce Berkowitz would examine if working capital management explains the gap.
4.96
Fair value ratio 50-75% of PAAS's 6.68. Bruce Berkowitz would examine if business quality explains the gap.
0.70%
Positive earnings while PAAS shows losses. John Neff would investigate earnings advantage.
-11.76%
Both companies show negative FCF. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide capital intensity issues.