95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
These metrics indicate whether the stock trades cheaply or expensively relative to its fundamentals. Value investors use them to find mispricings—buying stocks that appear undervalued, with solid long-term prospects and limited downside risk.
24.35
P/E above 1.5x PAAS's 16.16. Jim Chanos would check for potential multiple compression risks.
53.02
P/S above 1.5x PAAS's 23.21. Michael Burry would check for mean reversion risks.
3.61
Similar P/B to PAAS's 3.74. Philip Fisher would investigate if similar multiples reflect similar asset efficiency.
77.59
Positive FCF while PAAS shows negative FCF. John Neff would investigate cash generation advantage.
77.59
P/OCF 50-75% of PAAS's 143.14. Bruce Berkowitz would examine if working capital management explains the gap.
3.61
Similar fair value ratio to PAAS's 3.74. Walter Schloss would investigate if similar valuations reflect similar quality.
1.03%
Earnings yield 50-75% of PAAS's 1.55%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize if lower yield reflects better quality.
1.29%
Positive FCF while PAAS shows negative FCF. John Neff would investigate cash generation advantage.