95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
These metrics indicate whether the stock trades cheaply or expensively relative to its fundamentals. Value investors use them to find mispricings—buying stocks that appear undervalued, with solid long-term prospects and limited downside risk.
55.88
Positive P/E while PAAS shows losses. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
40.93
P/S above 1.5x PAAS's 12.03. Michael Burry would check for mean reversion risks.
1.47
Similar P/B to PAAS's 1.43. Philip Fisher would investigate if similar multiples reflect similar asset efficiency.
-18.91
Negative FCF while PAAS shows P/FCF of 277.27. Joel Greenblatt would examine cash flow improvement potential.
70.14
P/OCF 1.25-1.5x PAAS's 54.15. Martin Whitman would scrutinize if premium reflects better business model.
1.47
Similar fair value ratio to PAAS's 1.43. Walter Schloss would investigate if similar valuations reflect similar quality.
0.45%
Positive earnings while PAAS shows losses. John Neff would investigate earnings advantage.
-5.29%
Negative FCF while PAAS shows yield of 0.36%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cash flow improvement potential.