PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
226.29 - 230.79
161.38 - 242.52
38.50M / 42.21M (Avg.)
34.73 | 6.57
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
3.25%
Revenue growth 0-5% indicates modest expansion. Howard Marks would investigate if this reflects market maturity.
1.59%
Cost of revenue up 0-5% reflects moderate cost pressure. Philip Fisher would verify if price increases can offset.
4.97%
Gross profit growth below 5% signals weak core performance. Seth Klarman would demand evidence of turnaround potential.
1.66%
Gross margin improvement 1-3% reflects positive momentum. Philip Fisher would verify competitive position.
10.80%
R&D growth above 10% signals aggressive investment. Seth Klarman would demand evidence of future payoff potential.
10.90%
G&A growth above 5% signals concerning overhead expansion. Seth Klarman would demand justification for increased costs.
8.80%
Marketing expense growth 5-10% suggests significant investment. Howard Marks would investigate ROI on increased spending.
-57.46%
Negative other expenses growth needs verification. Benjamin Graham would examine sustainability.
7.49%
Operating expenses growth 5-10% suggests significant expansion. Howard Marks would investigate necessity.
4.14%
Total costs growth 3-5% suggests significant expansion. Howard Marks would investigate necessity.
-8.54%
Negative interest expense growth needs verification. Benjamin Graham would examine debt reduction strategy.
3.03%
D&A growth 0-5% reflects moderate asset expansion. Benjamin Graham would check if growth drives future value.
10.12%
EBITDA growth 8-12% reflects healthy business expansion. Philip Fisher would verify competitive position.
0.01%
EBITDA margin growth 0-1% suggests stable operations. Benjamin Graham would check for improvement potential.
-4.15%
Negative operating income growth needs thorough analysis. Benjamin Graham would examine operational issues.
-7.17%
Negative operating margin growth needs thorough analysis. Benjamin Graham would examine operational issues.
124.66%
Other expenses growth above 30% signals concerning expansion. Seth Klarman would scrutinize unusual items.
17.42%
Pre-tax income growth above 15% demonstrates exceptional profitability improvement. Warren Buffett would verify sustainability.
13.72%
Pre-tax margin growth above 5% demonstrates exceptional cost management. Warren Buffett would verify sustainability.
-28.37%
Negative tax expense growth needs verification. Benjamin Graham would examine sustainability.
29.28%
Net income growth above 15% demonstrates exceptional bottom-line expansion. Warren Buffett would verify sustainability.
25.20%
Net margin growth above 5% demonstrates exceptional profitability improvement. Warren Buffett would verify sustainability.
29.00%
EPS growth above 15% demonstrates exceptional shareholder value creation. Warren Buffett would verify sustainability.
28.57%
Diluted EPS growth above 15% demonstrates exceptional value creation despite potential dilution. Warren Buffett would verify sustainability.
0.52%
Share increase 0-2% indicates slight dilution. Howard Marks would investigate necessity.
0.36%
Diluted share increase 0-2% indicates slight dilution. Howard Marks would investigate necessity.