PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
743.76 - 757.57
479.80 - 796.25
8.25M / 11.73M (Avg.)
27.40 | 27.58
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
15.77%
Net income growth 15-20% – Very strong. Benjamin Graham would check if leverage or cyclical factors boost earnings artificially.
1.03%
D&A up to 5% yoy – Manageable. Seth Klarman would see normal expansions if revenue justifies the extra depreciation.
124.68%
Deferred taxes above 30% yoy – Significant surge. Philip Fisher would demand clarity on what drives this big potential future tax burden.
1.74%
SBC up to 10% yoy – Acceptable. Seth Klarman would expect net income to grow enough to offset the mild dilution.
-33.52%
A negative yoy change in working capital can free up cash. Benjamin Graham would confirm it is not from falling demand or asset disposal.
48.58%
Receivables above 15% yoy – Alarm for possible major collection issues. Philip Fisher would investigate if revenue recognition is artificially boosted.
-99.40%
Negative inventory growth can release cash if sales remain solid. Benjamin Graham would confirm no slump in revenue driving the decline.
143.90%
AP above 30% yoy – High. Philip Fisher would suspect possible cash strain or very aggressive use of supplier credit.
-100.56%
A negative yoy shift in other WC might free up cash flow. Benjamin Graham would confirm the items are not essential to operations or revenue generation.
-33.33%
A negative yoy shift in other non-cash items can lower reported volatility. Benjamin Graham would confirm it is not concealing real operational costs or artificially inflating net income.
11.85%
Operating cash flow growth 10-15% – Solid. Seth Klarman would see a healthy sign for near-term liquidity and reinvestment.
-10.05%
A negative yoy CapEx shift boosts near-term FCF if capacity is adequate. Benjamin Graham would see it as beneficial unless future growth is sacrificed.
-221.05%
A negative yoy shift indicates smaller M&A outflows or even net proceeds from divestitures. Benjamin Graham would see it as beneficial unless growth is stalled.
-18.80%
A negative yoy shift can boost short-term liquidity if no prime investments appear. Benjamin Graham would consider it wise if safer returns do not exist.
129.55%
Proceeds growth above 30% yoy – Significant inflow. Warren Buffett would verify if it is opportunistic liquidation or a sign of pulling out from less profitable ventures.
-80.49%
A negative yoy shift can free up liquidity if expansions or intangible items are cut back. Benjamin Graham would see it as beneficial for near-term returns unless it hampers growth.
37.30%
Above 15% yoy – Heavy. Philip Fisher would require evidence these invests drive future returns and do not hamper free cash flow too much.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.