PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
743.76 - 757.57
479.80 - 796.25
8.25M / 11.73M (Avg.)
27.40 | 27.58
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-33.30%
Negative net income growth indicates shrinking profitability. Benjamin Graham would label it a concern unless explained by temporary factors.
8.79%
D&A 5-10% yoy – Noticeable rise. Peter Lynch would hope new assets produce higher revenue to offset the expense.
220.76%
Deferred taxes above 30% yoy – Significant surge. Philip Fisher would demand clarity on what drives this big potential future tax burden.
4.87%
SBC up to 10% yoy – Acceptable. Seth Klarman would expect net income to grow enough to offset the mild dilution.
542.90%
Working capital above 30% yoy – Very high. Philip Fisher would demand clarity on whether the buildup is strategic or signals inefficiency.
220.57%
Receivables above 15% yoy – Alarm for possible major collection issues. Philip Fisher would investigate if revenue recognition is artificially boosted.
-25.59%
Negative inventory growth can release cash if sales remain solid. Benjamin Graham would confirm no slump in revenue driving the decline.
-139.29%
A negative yoy AP change means the firm is paying down supplier credit. Benjamin Graham would see it as lowering short-term liabilities if revenue is stable.
-30.34%
A negative yoy shift in other WC might free up cash flow. Benjamin Graham would confirm the items are not essential to operations or revenue generation.
200.00%
Above 30% yoy – Major jump. Philip Fisher would investigate whether this is a recurring or truly one-time distortion.
21.12%
Operating cash flow growth above 20% – Exceptional. Warren Buffett would ensure it stems from sustainable operations, not just working capital shifts.
13.22%
CapEx 10-15% yoy – Could pressure free cash flow. Howard Marks would expect robust returns on these investments.
92.58%
Acquisition spending above 15% yoy – Aggressive M&A approach. Philip Fisher would demand evidence the acquisitions truly enhance shareholder value.
-65.70%
A negative yoy shift can boost short-term liquidity if no prime investments appear. Benjamin Graham would consider it wise if safer returns do not exist.
40.65%
Proceeds growth above 30% yoy – Significant inflow. Warren Buffett would verify if it is opportunistic liquidation or a sign of pulling out from less profitable ventures.
-166.67%
A negative yoy shift can free up liquidity if expansions or intangible items are cut back. Benjamin Graham would see it as beneficial for near-term returns unless it hampers growth.
-1.81%
A negative yoy shift suggests smaller outflows or net inflows if disposals exceed invests. Benjamin Graham would see a short-term FCF benefit unless growth is compromised.
29.08%
Debt repayment growth above 20% yoy – Strong deleveraging. Warren Buffett would see improved balance sheet health unless expansions are starved.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3.55%
Buyback growth 0-5% yoy – Minimal. Howard Marks would question if more capital allocation is needed for expansions or deeper buybacks.