PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-18.52%
Negative net income growth indicates shrinking profitability. Benjamin Graham would label it a concern unless explained by temporary factors.
38.80%
D&A above 15% yoy – Large jump. Philip Fisher would demand significant returns to validate the extra depreciation load.
-94.21%
A negative yoy change in deferred tax might cut future liabilities. Benjamin Graham would verify whether real tax payments are simply being recognized sooner.
2.66%
SBC up to 10% yoy – Acceptable. Seth Klarman would expect net income to grow enough to offset the mild dilution.
11.69%
Working capital 10-20% yoy – Noticeable usage. Peter Lynch would question whether revenues are growing enough to justify the extra tie-up.
-314.43%
Negative receivables growth can be beneficial for cash flow if revenue remains stable. Benjamin Graham would confirm it is not from collapsing sales.
38.58%
Inventory above 15% yoy – Large spike. Philip Fisher would demand clarity on whether sales growth can absorb the extra stock.
220.53%
AP above 30% yoy – High. Philip Fisher would suspect possible cash strain or very aggressive use of supplier credit.
66.68%
Above 30% yoy – Major jump. Philip Fisher would demand details on these miscellaneous lines to ensure transparency.
-13.50%
A negative yoy shift in other non-cash items can lower reported volatility. Benjamin Graham would confirm it is not concealing real operational costs or artificially inflating net income.
-5.79%
Negative yoy CFO growth indicates a decline in core cash generation. Benjamin Graham would treat it as a serious warning unless cyclical factors explain it.
-11.58%
A negative yoy CapEx shift boosts near-term FCF if capacity is adequate. Benjamin Graham would see it as beneficial unless future growth is sacrificed.
-3483.44%
A negative yoy shift indicates smaller M&A outflows or even net proceeds from divestitures. Benjamin Graham would see it as beneficial unless growth is stalled.
-10.08%
A negative yoy shift can boost short-term liquidity if no prime investments appear. Benjamin Graham would consider it wise if safer returns do not exist.
18.61%
Proceeds growth 10-20% yoy – Solid. Seth Klarman would see moderate improvements in cash if selling prices are good.
-613.04%
A negative yoy shift can free up liquidity if expansions or intangible items are cut back. Benjamin Graham would see it as beneficial for near-term returns unless it hampers growth.
-107.98%
A negative yoy shift suggests smaller outflows or net inflows if disposals exceed invests. Benjamin Graham would see a short-term FCF benefit unless growth is compromised.
-566.67%
A negative yoy figure indicates less repayment or possibly new debt issuance. Benjamin Graham would see rising leverage as a red flag unless expansions have strong returns.
3.55%
Issuance up to 5% yoy – Mild. Seth Klarman would check if net income or free cash can offset these newly issued shares.
36.59%
Buyback growth above 20% yoy – Very shareholder-friendly. Warren Buffett would confirm the shares are repurchased at or below intrinsic value.