PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
29.14%
Net income growth above 20% – Outstanding. Warren Buffett would verify whether this rise is driven by core operations or one-time items.
6.51%
D&A 5-10% yoy – Noticeable rise. Peter Lynch would hope new assets produce higher revenue to offset the expense.
4.32%
Deferred taxes up to 10% yoy – Acceptable. Seth Klarman would check if normal timing differences cause the moderate change.
-2.01%
Negative yoy SBC growth reduces new equity issuance. Benjamin Graham would verify that enough talent investment remains for growth.
-38.50%
A negative yoy change in working capital can free up cash. Benjamin Graham would confirm it is not from falling demand or asset disposal.
-150.97%
Negative receivables growth can be beneficial for cash flow if revenue remains stable. Benjamin Graham would confirm it is not from collapsing sales.
321.53%
Inventory above 15% yoy – Large spike. Philip Fisher would demand clarity on whether sales growth can absorb the extra stock.
120.79%
AP above 30% yoy – High. Philip Fisher would suspect possible cash strain or very aggressive use of supplier credit.
40.20%
Above 30% yoy – Major jump. Philip Fisher would demand details on these miscellaneous lines to ensure transparency.
-5.46%
A negative yoy shift in other non-cash items can lower reported volatility. Benjamin Graham would confirm it is not concealing real operational costs or artificially inflating net income.
-48.05%
Negative yoy CFO growth indicates a decline in core cash generation. Benjamin Graham would treat it as a serious warning unless cyclical factors explain it.
-16.22%
A negative yoy CapEx shift boosts near-term FCF if capacity is adequate. Benjamin Graham would see it as beneficial unless future growth is sacrificed.
-1881.56%
A negative yoy shift indicates smaller M&A outflows or even net proceeds from divestitures. Benjamin Graham would see it as beneficial unless growth is stalled.
20.42%
Above 20% yoy – Large jump. Philip Fisher would demand clarity on the risk/return of tying up major liquidity in investments.
1.98%
Proceeds growth 0-5% yoy – Slight. Howard Marks would suspect limited sales or maturities, not a major strategic move.
164.85%
Above 20% yoy – Large jump. Philip Fisher would demand clarity on whether these “other” items overshadow core expansions.
39.05%
Above 15% yoy – Heavy. Philip Fisher would require evidence these invests drive future returns and do not hamper free cash flow too much.
-219.87%
A negative yoy figure indicates less repayment or possibly new debt issuance. Benjamin Graham would see rising leverage as a red flag unless expansions have strong returns.
-43.98%
A negative yoy figure could mean fewer or no new shares or even net buybacks. Benjamin Graham would see it as positive unless expansions need capital that internal cash cannot provide.
25.73%
Buyback growth above 20% yoy – Very shareholder-friendly. Warren Buffett would confirm the shares are repurchased at or below intrinsic value.