5.38 - 5.60
4.95 - 8.28
2.3K / 2.4K (Avg.)
-279.00 | -0.02
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
-96.43%
Cash & equivalents declining signals potential liquidity drain. Benjamin Graham would investigate if this is from strategic investments or operational shortfalls.
-44.40%
Declining short-term investments could free up capital but reduces near-liquid buffer. Philip Fisher would examine if this supports growth or signals cash constraints.
-96.43%
Declining total liquid assets may signal capital redeployment or liquidity concerns. Howard Marks would investigate the underlying causes.
-6.05%
Declining receivables is generally positive, indicating better collections. Benjamin Graham would verify revenue stability alongside the reduction.
-2.65%
Declining inventory generally indicates efficient management. Seth Klarman would confirm this doesn't create stock-out risks.
-100.00%
Declining other current assets simplifies the balance sheet. Howard Marks would confirm no essential assets are being eliminated.
-32.85%
Declining current assets may signal efficient working capital or liquidity concerns. Benjamin Graham would investigate the composition of the decline.
-0.71%
Declining PP&E may indicate underinvestment or asset sales. Seth Klarman would question future capacity constraints.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
11.76%
Intangibles growing over 5% yoy – risk of over-capitalizing IP or acquisitions. Philip Fisher would demand clarity on R&D capitalization or synergy assumptions.
6.73%
Above 5% yoy – intangible buildup. Philip Fisher demands clarity on acquisitions or R&D capitalization that could raise impairment risk.
1.05%
Growth 0-5% yoy – slight change. Peter Lynch wonders if the firm is cautious or sees limited investment opportunities.
7.41%
Above 5% yoy – possibly bigger operating losses or deferrals. Philip Fisher would question the root causes of rising tax credits.
-44.40%
Declining other non-current assets simplifies the balance sheet. Seth Klarman would favor this reduction in complexity.
-0.73%
Declining non-current assets may signal asset sales or underinvestment. Howard Marks would investigate future growth implications.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-15.67%
Declining total assets may signal asset sales or strategic downsizing. Seth Klarman would investigate the strategic rationale.
-19.01%
Declining payables indicates faster supplier payments but reduces free financing. Howard Marks would verify liquidity remains adequate.
-59.80%
Declining short-term debt reduces immediate leverage risk. Benjamin Graham would see this as improving financial safety.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
9.87%
Above 5% yoy – potential spike in near-term liabilities. Philip Fisher demands details on these obligations.
-41.08%
Declining current liabilities reduces short-term financial pressure. Seth Klarman would see this as improving liquidity position.
0.13%
Up to 5% yoy – small increase. Howard Marks questions if cash flow comfortably covers new interest.
-3.39%
Declining non-current deferred revenue may signal weaker long-term contract pipeline. Benjamin Graham would investigate business model sustainability.
-0.84%
Declining deferred tax liabilities reduces future tax burdens. Seth Klarman would see this as improving long-term cash flow outlook.
-11.67%
Declining other non-current liabilities reduces long-term obligations. Howard Marks would see this as improving future financial flexibility.
-2.34%
Declining total non-current liabilities reduces long-term leverage risk. Benjamin Graham would see this as strengthening the balance sheet.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-23.53%
Declining total liabilities strengthens the balance sheet. Howard Marks would see this as reducing financial risk.
1.41%
Up to 5% yoy – small issuance. Howard Marks asks if new capital is used productively.
3.01%
0-5% yoy – slight gain. Peter Lynch wonders if net income or dividends cause slower growth.
1.21%
Up to 20% yoy – moderate increase. Howard Marks warns these gains can reverse if markets shift.
-1.21%
Declining other equity items simplifies the capital structure. Benjamin Graham would favor this reduction in complexity.
1.41%
0-5% yoy – modestly growing or flat equity. Seth Klarman sees mild improvement if consistent with earnings.
-15.67%
Declining total capital may indicate asset sales or poor capital allocation. Howard Marks would investigate strategic implications.
-1.45%
Declining total investments may signal portfolio liquidation or limited opportunities. Benjamin Graham would investigate strategic focus.
-29.46%
Declining total debt reduces leverage risk. Seth Klarman would see this as improving financial stability and flexibility.
5.12%
Above 5% yoy – net debt expansion. Philip Fisher demands clarity on the reason for higher leverage vs. cash.
