1.90 - 2.15
0.48 - 2.54
9.88M / 2.92M (Avg.)
-0.48 | -4.19
Highlights the firm's ability to meet near-term obligations and cover interest expenses. For conservative value investors, strong liquidity and coverage metrics are critical to avoid distress or forced dilution.
2.46
2–3 – Solid buffer. Benjamin Graham might see this as prudent management of working capital.
1.50
1.2–1.5 – Acceptable for many industries. Peter Lynch would want stable cash flows to avoid dipping below 1.
0.99
0.7–1.0 – Decent. Peter Lynch might see partial reliance on future cash inflows to fully cover obligations.
5.63
5–10 – Solid coverage. Seth Klarman might verify if the ratio is consistent or if one-off gains boost EBIT.
-0.53
Negative short-term coverage ratio usually means negative OCF or an outsized near-term debt – a major Graham red flag.