1.90 - 2.15
0.48 - 2.54
9.88M / 2.92M (Avg.)
-0.48 | -4.19
Highlights the firm's ability to meet near-term obligations and cover interest expenses. For conservative value investors, strong liquidity and coverage metrics are critical to avoid distress or forced dilution.
2.27
2–3 – Solid buffer. Benjamin Graham might see this as prudent management of working capital.
1.42
1.2–1.5 – Acceptable for many industries. Peter Lynch would want stable cash flows to avoid dipping below 1.
0.76
0.7–1.0 – Decent. Peter Lynch might see partial reliance on future cash inflows to fully cover obligations.
-0.92
Negative interest coverage suggests negative EBIT or an overbearing interest burden – a major red flag for Benjamin Graham.
0.92
Below 1.0 – Risk of falling short. Howard Marks would suspect the firm might need external funding if OCF falters.