PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
0.45%
Revenue growth 0-5% indicates modest expansion. Howard Marks would investigate if this reflects market maturity.
4.91%
Cost of revenue up 0-5% reflects moderate cost pressure. Philip Fisher would verify if price increases can offset.
-1.92%
Negative gross profit growth is a serious warning sign. Benjamin Graham would demand thorough analysis of pricing power and cost structure.
-2.36%
Negative gross margin growth suggests serious pricing or cost issues. Benjamin Graham would demand thorough analysis.
4.74%
R&D growth 0-5% reflects moderate investment. Benjamin Graham would check if spending drives future value.
12.73%
G&A growth above 5% signals concerning overhead expansion. Seth Klarman would demand justification for increased costs.
12.50%
Marketing expense growth above 10% signals aggressive spending. Seth Klarman would demand evidence of revenue impact.
42.50%
Other expenses growth above 20% signals concerning cost expansion. Seth Klarman would scrutinize unusual items.
9.44%
Operating expenses growth 5-10% suggests significant expansion. Howard Marks would investigate necessity.
7.23%
Total costs growth above 5% signals concerning expansion. Seth Klarman would demand justification.
7.55%
Interest expense growth 5-10% suggests rising debt costs. Howard Marks would investigate necessity.
-4.48%
Negative D&A growth needs verification. Benjamin Graham would examine asset reduction strategy.
-6.90%
Negative EBITDA growth needs thorough analysis. Benjamin Graham would examine operational issues.
-13.31%
Negative EBITDA margin growth needs thorough analysis. Benjamin Graham would examine operational issues.
-20.72%
Negative operating income growth needs thorough analysis. Benjamin Graham would examine operational issues.
-21.08%
Negative operating margin growth needs thorough analysis. Benjamin Graham would examine operational issues.
-370.89%
Negative other expenses growth needs verification. Benjamin Graham would examine sustainability.
-21.84%
Negative pre-tax income growth needs thorough analysis. Benjamin Graham would examine operational issues.
-22.19%
Negative pre-tax margin growth needs thorough analysis. Benjamin Graham would examine operational issues.
-160.20%
Negative tax expense growth needs verification. Benjamin Graham would examine sustainability.
18.72%
Net income growth above 15% demonstrates exceptional bottom-line expansion. Warren Buffett would verify sustainability.
18.19%
Net margin growth above 5% demonstrates exceptional profitability improvement. Warren Buffett would verify sustainability.
18.31%
EPS growth above 15% demonstrates exceptional shareholder value creation. Warren Buffett would verify sustainability.
18.57%
Diluted EPS growth above 15% demonstrates exceptional value creation despite potential dilution. Warren Buffett would verify sustainability.
-0.13%
Share count reduction needs verification. Benjamin Graham would examine sustainability.
-0.09%
Diluted share reduction needs verification. Benjamin Graham would examine sustainability.