PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
0.58%
Revenue growth 0-5% indicates modest expansion. Howard Marks would investigate if this reflects market maturity.
-2.94%
Negative cost of revenue growth (cost reduction) can be positive but verify quality impact. Benjamin Graham would examine if cost cuts are sustainable.
2.08%
Gross profit growth below 5% signals weak core performance. Seth Klarman would demand evidence of turnaround potential.
1.49%
Gross margin improvement 1-3% reflects positive momentum. Philip Fisher would verify competitive position.
-1.19%
Negative R&D growth (spending reduction) needs careful analysis. Benjamin Graham would examine impact on competitive position.
-32.91%
Negative G&A growth (overhead reduction) needs verification. Benjamin Graham would examine impact on operations.
-16.39%
Negative marketing expense growth needs careful analysis. Benjamin Graham would examine impact on market presence.
-124.59%
Negative other expenses growth needs verification. Benjamin Graham would examine sustainability.
-12.02%
Negative operating expenses growth needs verification. Benjamin Graham would examine sustainability.
-7.24%
Negative total costs growth needs verification. Benjamin Graham would examine sustainability.
8.92%
Interest expense growth 5-10% suggests rising debt costs. Howard Marks would investigate necessity.
1.21%
D&A growth 0-5% reflects moderate asset expansion. Benjamin Graham would check if growth drives future value.
5.96%
EBITDA growth 4-8% suggests moderate improvement. Benjamin Graham would check quality of earnings.
9.28%
EBITDA margin growth above 5% demonstrates exceptional operational efficiency. Warren Buffett would verify sustainability.
10.89%
Operating income growth 8-12% reflects healthy business expansion. Philip Fisher would verify competitive position.
10.25%
Operating margin growth above 5% demonstrates exceptional efficiency gains. Warren Buffett would verify sustainability.
-17.76%
Negative other expenses growth needs verification. Benjamin Graham would examine sustainability.
10.34%
Pre-tax income growth 8-12% reflects healthy business expansion. Philip Fisher would verify competitive position.
9.70%
Pre-tax margin growth above 5% demonstrates exceptional cost management. Warren Buffett would verify sustainability.
7.47%
Tax expense growth 0-10% reflects moderate increase. Benjamin Graham would investigate drivers.
11.01%
Net income growth 8-12% reflects healthy business expansion. Philip Fisher would verify competitive position.
10.36%
Net margin growth above 5% demonstrates exceptional profitability improvement. Warren Buffett would verify sustainability.
11.11%
EPS growth 8-12% reflects healthy business expansion. Philip Fisher would verify competitive position.
11.15%
Diluted EPS growth 8-12% reflects healthy expansion. Philip Fisher would verify competitive position.
-0.07%
Share count reduction needs verification. Benjamin Graham would examine sustainability.
-0.07%
Diluted share reduction needs verification. Benjamin Graham would examine sustainability.