PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-1.96%
Negative revenue growth is a classic Benjamin Graham warning sign. While possibly cyclical, verify Market Share trends and Competitive Position.
-0.06%
Negative cost of revenue growth (cost reduction) can be positive but verify quality impact. Benjamin Graham would examine if cost cuts are sustainable.
-2.81%
Negative gross profit growth is a serious warning sign. Benjamin Graham would demand thorough analysis of pricing power and cost structure.
-0.87%
Negative gross margin growth suggests serious pricing or cost issues. Benjamin Graham would demand thorough analysis.
1.15%
R&D growth 0-5% reflects moderate investment. Benjamin Graham would check if spending drives future value.
-25.54%
Negative G&A growth (overhead reduction) needs verification. Benjamin Graham would examine impact on operations.
-12.60%
Negative marketing expense growth needs careful analysis. Benjamin Graham would examine impact on market presence.
85.12%
Other expenses growth above 20% signals concerning cost expansion. Seth Klarman would scrutinize unusual items.
-8.60%
Negative operating expenses growth needs verification. Benjamin Graham would examine sustainability.
-4.42%
Negative total costs growth needs verification. Benjamin Graham would examine sustainability.
-4.78%
Negative interest expense growth needs verification. Benjamin Graham would examine debt reduction strategy.
1.61%
D&A growth 0-5% reflects moderate asset expansion. Benjamin Graham would check if growth drives future value.
-3.29%
Negative EBITDA growth needs thorough analysis. Benjamin Graham would examine operational issues.
4.86%
EBITDA margin growth 3-5% shows strong cost control. Peter Lynch would examine pricing power.
2.27%
Operating income growth 0-4% indicates modest gains. Howard Marks would investigate growth potential.
4.31%
Operating margin growth 3-5% shows strong cost control. Peter Lynch would examine pricing power.
-100.00%
Negative other expenses growth needs verification. Benjamin Graham would examine sustainability.
0.71%
Pre-tax income growth 0-4% indicates modest gains. Howard Marks would investigate growth potential.
2.73%
Pre-tax margin growth 1-3% reflects healthy improvement. Philip Fisher would verify competitive position.
439.76%
Tax expense growth above 20% signals concerning expansion. Seth Klarman would scrutinize tax strategy.
-19.03%
Negative net income growth needs thorough analysis. Benjamin Graham would examine operational issues.
-17.40%
Negative net margin growth needs thorough analysis. Benjamin Graham would examine operational issues.
-18.60%
Negative EPS growth needs thorough analysis. Benjamin Graham would examine operational issues.
-19.30%
Negative diluted EPS growth needs thorough analysis. Benjamin Graham would examine operational issues.
-0.27%
Share count reduction needs verification. Benjamin Graham would examine sustainability.
-0.26%
Diluted share reduction needs verification. Benjamin Graham would examine sustainability.