PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-47.91%
Negative net income growth indicates shrinking profitability. Benjamin Graham would label it a concern unless explained by temporary factors.
5.00%
D&A 5-10% yoy – Noticeable rise. Peter Lynch would hope new assets produce higher revenue to offset the expense.
-24.59%
A negative yoy change in deferred tax might cut future liabilities. Benjamin Graham would verify whether real tax payments are simply being recognized sooner.
0.38%
SBC up to 10% yoy – Acceptable. Seth Klarman would expect net income to grow enough to offset the mild dilution.
-181.26%
A negative yoy change in working capital can free up cash. Benjamin Graham would confirm it is not from falling demand or asset disposal.
-314.91%
Negative receivables growth can be beneficial for cash flow if revenue remains stable. Benjamin Graham would confirm it is not from collapsing sales.
89.50%
Inventory above 15% yoy – Large spike. Philip Fisher would demand clarity on whether sales growth can absorb the extra stock.
26.52%
AP 20-30% yoy – Potential concern. Howard Marks would see risk if the firm delays payments or faces liquidity issues.
-174.24%
A negative yoy shift in other WC might free up cash flow. Benjamin Graham would confirm the items are not essential to operations or revenue generation.
-160.65%
A negative yoy shift in other non-cash items can lower reported volatility. Benjamin Graham would confirm it is not concealing real operational costs or artificially inflating net income.
-102.24%
Negative yoy CFO growth indicates a decline in core cash generation. Benjamin Graham would treat it as a serious warning unless cyclical factors explain it.
35.99%
CapEx above 15% yoy – Significant. Philip Fisher would demand strong evidence of high-ROI projects to offset the spending.
-100.00%
A negative yoy shift indicates smaller M&A outflows or even net proceeds from divestitures. Benjamin Graham would see it as beneficial unless growth is stalled.
-27.11%
A negative yoy shift can boost short-term liquidity if no prime investments appear. Benjamin Graham would consider it wise if safer returns do not exist.
42.29%
Proceeds growth above 30% yoy – Significant inflow. Warren Buffett would verify if it is opportunistic liquidation or a sign of pulling out from less profitable ventures.
-28.00%
A negative yoy shift can free up liquidity if expansions or intangible items are cut back. Benjamin Graham would see it as beneficial for near-term returns unless it hampers growth.
-2.00%
A negative yoy shift suggests smaller outflows or net inflows if disposals exceed invests. Benjamin Graham would see a short-term FCF benefit unless growth is compromised.
95.20%
Debt repayment growth above 20% yoy – Strong deleveraging. Warren Buffett would see improved balance sheet health unless expansions are starved.
92.91%
Issuance above 15% yoy – Significant equity raise. Philip Fisher would require a very compelling reason to risk heavy shareholder dilution.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.