PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
3.66%
Net income growth 0-5% – Slight. Howard Marks would worry about possible stagnation in bottom-line profitability.
7.41%
D&A 5-10% yoy – Noticeable rise. Peter Lynch would hope new assets produce higher revenue to offset the expense.
-20.09%
A negative yoy change in deferred tax might cut future liabilities. Benjamin Graham would verify whether real tax payments are simply being recognized sooner.
14.97%
SBC 10-20% yoy – Noticeable. Peter Lynch would worry about dilution unless top-line expansions justify more equity grants.
-3110.34%
A negative yoy change in working capital can free up cash. Benjamin Graham would confirm it is not from falling demand or asset disposal.
241.67%
Receivables above 15% yoy – Alarm for possible major collection issues. Philip Fisher would investigate if revenue recognition is artificially boosted.
22.34%
Inventory above 15% yoy – Large spike. Philip Fisher would demand clarity on whether sales growth can absorb the extra stock.
-401.64%
A negative yoy AP change means the firm is paying down supplier credit. Benjamin Graham would see it as lowering short-term liabilities if revenue is stable.
-40.30%
A negative yoy shift in other WC might free up cash flow. Benjamin Graham would confirm the items are not essential to operations or revenue generation.
-1800.00%
A negative yoy shift in other non-cash items can lower reported volatility. Benjamin Graham would confirm it is not concealing real operational costs or artificially inflating net income.
-69.13%
Negative yoy CFO growth indicates a decline in core cash generation. Benjamin Graham would treat it as a serious warning unless cyclical factors explain it.
-22.40%
A negative yoy CapEx shift boosts near-term FCF if capacity is adequate. Benjamin Graham would see it as beneficial unless future growth is sacrificed.
100.00%
Acquisition spending above 15% yoy – Aggressive M&A approach. Philip Fisher would demand evidence the acquisitions truly enhance shareholder value.
39.96%
Above 20% yoy – Large jump. Philip Fisher would demand clarity on the risk/return of tying up major liquidity in investments.
2.54%
Proceeds growth 0-5% yoy – Slight. Howard Marks would suspect limited sales or maturities, not a major strategic move.
40.00%
Above 20% yoy – Large jump. Philip Fisher would demand clarity on whether these “other” items overshadow core expansions.
94.56%
Above 15% yoy – Heavy. Philip Fisher would require evidence these invests drive future returns and do not hamper free cash flow too much.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-4.19%
A negative yoy indicates fewer share repurchases than last year or none. Benjamin Graham would see potential missed per-share gains if the stock is undervalued.