PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
21.88%
Net income growth above 20% – Outstanding. Warren Buffett would verify whether this rise is driven by core operations or one-time items.
3.69%
D&A up to 5% yoy – Manageable. Seth Klarman would see normal expansions if revenue justifies the extra depreciation.
-971.43%
A negative yoy change in deferred tax might cut future liabilities. Benjamin Graham would verify whether real tax payments are simply being recognized sooner.
-1.43%
Negative yoy SBC growth reduces new equity issuance. Benjamin Graham would verify that enough talent investment remains for growth.
61.66%
Working capital above 30% yoy – Very high. Philip Fisher would demand clarity on whether the buildup is strategic or signals inefficiency.
-89.07%
Negative receivables growth can be beneficial for cash flow if revenue remains stable. Benjamin Graham would confirm it is not from collapsing sales.
-216.95%
Negative inventory growth can release cash if sales remain solid. Benjamin Graham would confirm no slump in revenue driving the decline.
-6.15%
A negative yoy AP change means the firm is paying down supplier credit. Benjamin Graham would see it as lowering short-term liabilities if revenue is stable.
113.77%
Above 30% yoy – Major jump. Philip Fisher would demand details on these miscellaneous lines to ensure transparency.
840.00%
Above 30% yoy – Major jump. Philip Fisher would investigate whether this is a recurring or truly one-time distortion.
99.67%
Operating cash flow growth above 20% – Exceptional. Warren Buffett would ensure it stems from sustainable operations, not just working capital shifts.
-23.53%
A negative yoy CapEx shift boosts near-term FCF if capacity is adequate. Benjamin Graham would see it as beneficial unless future growth is sacrificed.
70.44%
Acquisition spending above 15% yoy – Aggressive M&A approach. Philip Fisher would demand evidence the acquisitions truly enhance shareholder value.
-29.66%
A negative yoy shift can boost short-term liquidity if no prime investments appear. Benjamin Graham would consider it wise if safer returns do not exist.
173.00%
Proceeds growth above 30% yoy – Significant inflow. Warren Buffett would verify if it is opportunistic liquidation or a sign of pulling out from less profitable ventures.
41.18%
Above 20% yoy – Large jump. Philip Fisher would demand clarity on whether these “other” items overshadow core expansions.
64.24%
Above 15% yoy – Heavy. Philip Fisher would require evidence these invests drive future returns and do not hamper free cash flow too much.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-97.32%
A negative yoy figure could mean fewer or no new shares or even net buybacks. Benjamin Graham would see it as positive unless expansions need capital that internal cash cannot provide.
-41.69%
A negative yoy indicates fewer share repurchases than last year or none. Benjamin Graham would see potential missed per-share gains if the stock is undervalued.