1.90 - 2.15
0.48 - 2.54
9.88M / 3.06M (Avg.)
-0.59 | -3.40
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
-28.61%
Cash & equivalents declining signals potential liquidity drain. Benjamin Graham would investigate if this is from strategic investments or operational shortfalls.
-16.01%
Declining short-term investments could free up capital but reduces near-liquid buffer. Philip Fisher would examine if this supports growth or signals cash constraints.
-26.37%
Declining total liquid assets may signal capital redeployment or liquidity concerns. Howard Marks would investigate the underlying causes.
37.94%
Net receivables growing more than 5% yoy – potential collection risk if top-line isn't equally strong. Philip Fisher would demand clarity on credit policy vs. revenue gains.
115.87%
Inventory growth above 5% yoy – potential capital tie-up or excess stock risk. Philip Fisher would demand a correlation with sales growth.
16.68%
Other current assets up over 5% yoy – potential ballooning of intangible or prepayments. Philip Fisher would scrutinize the nature of these assets carefully.
7.37%
Growth 5-10% – moderate improvement. Seth Klarman would verify if the rise aligns with revenue expansion.
13.78%
Net PP&E growth 10-20% yoy – strong investment in physical assets. Warren Buffett examines if returns on these assets meet the cost of capital.
3.82%
Goodwill up to 5% yoy – small acquisition or intangible addition. Howard Marks would check if synergy justifies the premium.
-7.82%
Declining intangible assets reduces future impairment risk. Benjamin Graham would favor this balance sheet simplification.
-0.75%
Declining total intangibles reduces balance sheet risk. Seth Klarman would see this as improving asset quality.
-20.61%
Declining long-term investments may signal strategic refocus. Howard Marks would investigate if this improves capital allocation.
200.00%
Above 5% yoy – possibly bigger operating losses or deferrals. Philip Fisher would question the root causes of rising tax credits.
-42.63%
Declining other non-current assets simplifies the balance sheet. Seth Klarman would favor this reduction in complexity.
-2.59%
Declining non-current assets may signal asset sales or underinvestment. Howard Marks would investigate future growth implications.
-100.00%
Declining other assets reduces balance sheet complexity. Benjamin Graham would see this as improving transparency.
-1.21%
Declining total assets may signal asset sales or strategic downsizing. Seth Klarman would investigate the strategic rationale.
153.94%
AP up over 5% yoy – potential sign of delayed payments or aggressive working capital management. Philip Fisher demands clarity on vendor terms vs. revenue expansion.
282.05%
Above 5% yoy – possibly heightened near-term obligations. Philip Fisher would check for adequate liquidity or strong cash flows to service these debts.
-79.29%
Declining tax payables may indicate lower profits or faster payments. Seth Klarman would investigate the underlying cause.
-19.62%
Declining deferred revenue may signal weaker future sales pipeline. Howard Marks would investigate customer retention and new bookings.
-41.37%
Declining other current liabilities reduces near-term obligations. Benjamin Graham would see this as improving short-term financial position.
64.74%
Above 15% yoy – a notable jump. Philip Fisher demands clarity on how short-term liabilities are managed.
22.93%
Above 5% yoy – expanding LT debt. Philip Fisher demands clarity on whether growth justifies added leverage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-20.80%
Declining deferred tax liabilities reduces future tax burdens. Seth Klarman would see this as improving long-term cash flow outlook.
-55.93%
Declining other non-current liabilities reduces long-term obligations. Howard Marks would see this as improving future financial flexibility.
-15.19%
Declining total non-current liabilities reduces long-term leverage risk. Benjamin Graham would see this as strengthening the balance sheet.
-100.00%
Declining other liabilities simplifies the balance sheet. Seth Klarman would favor this reduction in complexity and unknown obligations.
13.49%
Above 10% yoy – large jump. Philip Fisher demands clarity on whether growth justifies the leverage.
1.19%
Up to 5% yoy – small issuance. Howard Marks asks if new capital is used productively.
-104.72%
Declining retained earnings signals net losses or large dividends. Seth Klarman would investigate the sustainability of dividend policy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
45.18%
Above 10% yoy – bigger jump. Philip Fisher demands clarity on unusual equity expansions.
-4.36%
Declining stockholders equity may signal losses or large distributions. Seth Klarman would investigate the underlying causes and sustainability.
-1.21%
Declining total capital may indicate asset sales or poor capital allocation. Howard Marks would investigate strategic implications.
-19.87%
Declining total investments may signal portfolio liquidation or limited opportunities. Benjamin Graham would investigate strategic focus.
41.69%
Above 5% yoy – debt expansion. Philip Fisher demands clarity on whether new debt is productive or just adding leverage.
68.61%
Above 5% yoy – net debt expansion. Philip Fisher demands clarity on the reason for higher leverage vs. cash.
