PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
2.03%
Cash & equivalents yoy growth 0-5% – slight improvement. Peter Lynch would verify if this aligns with revenue trends and if working capital remains healthy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.03%
Cash + STI yoy growth 0-5% – slight gain. Peter Lynch would verify if the firm's operational cash flow sustains normal expansions.
39.73%
Net receivables growing more than 5% yoy – potential collection risk if top-line isn't equally strong. Philip Fisher would demand clarity on credit policy vs. revenue gains.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-6.77%
Declining other current assets simplifies the balance sheet. Howard Marks would confirm no essential assets are being eliminated.
2.47%
Growth 0-5% – slight uptick. Peter Lynch would see it as generally stable if working capital remains sufficient.
-0.50%
Declining PP&E may indicate underinvestment or asset sales. Seth Klarman would question future capacity constraints.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-27.04%
Declining long-term investments may signal strategic refocus. Howard Marks would investigate if this improves capital allocation.
-40.25%
Declining tax assets may indicate improving profitability or asset utilization. Benjamin Graham would see this as positive.
-2.84%
Declining other non-current assets simplifies the balance sheet. Seth Klarman would favor this reduction in complexity.
-3.06%
Declining non-current assets may signal asset sales or underinvestment. Howard Marks would investigate future growth implications.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.66%
Declining total assets may signal asset sales or strategic downsizing. Seth Klarman would investigate the strategic rationale.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.23%
Up to 15% yoy – moderate increase. Howard Marks watches if working capital covers this growth.
-11.10%
Declining long-term debt reduces leverage risk. Howard Marks would see this as improving financial stability.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Declining other non-current liabilities reduces long-term obligations. Howard Marks would see this as improving future financial flexibility.
-70.03%
Declining total non-current liabilities reduces long-term leverage risk. Benjamin Graham would see this as strengthening the balance sheet.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-36.12%
Declining total liabilities strengthens the balance sheet. Howard Marks would see this as reducing financial risk.
-100.00%
Declining common stock may indicate share buybacks. Benjamin Graham would verify if shares are repurchased at reasonable prices.
20.82%
≥ 20% yoy – strong reinvested profits. Benjamin Graham checks that earnings quality is high.
-107.84%
Declining AOCI may indicate reduced unrealized gains or currency losses. Howard Marks would see this as potentially reducing volatility.
-113.76%
Declining other equity items simplifies the capital structure. Benjamin Graham would favor this reduction in complexity.
3.40%
0-5% yoy – modestly growing or flat equity. Seth Klarman sees mild improvement if consistent with earnings.
-1.66%
Declining total capital may indicate asset sales or poor capital allocation. Howard Marks would investigate strategic implications.
-27.04%
Declining total investments may signal portfolio liquidation or limited opportunities. Benjamin Graham would investigate strategic focus.
-7.69%
Declining total debt reduces leverage risk. Seth Klarman would see this as improving financial stability and flexibility.
-3.52%
Declining net debt indicates improving liquidity or deleveraging. Howard Marks would see this as strengthening financial position.