226.29 - 230.79
161.38 - 242.52
38.50M / 42.21M (Avg.)
34.73 | 6.57
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-481.78%
Negative net income growth indicates shrinking profitability. Benjamin Graham would label it a concern unless explained by temporary factors.
-0.55%
Negative yoy D&A growth lowers the drag on net earnings. Benjamin Graham would confirm if it is due to fully depreciated assets or a slower expansion cycle.
23.42%
Deferred taxes 20-30% yoy – Larger liability accumulation. Howard Marks would consider if rising tax obligations hamper future free cash flow.
-23.42%
Negative yoy SBC growth reduces new equity issuance. Benjamin Graham would verify that enough talent investment remains for growth.
-194.85%
A negative yoy change in working capital can free up cash. Benjamin Graham would confirm it is not from falling demand or asset disposal.
104.59%
Receivables above 15% yoy – Alarm for possible major collection issues. Philip Fisher would investigate if revenue recognition is artificially boosted.
163.32%
Inventory above 15% yoy – Large spike. Philip Fisher would demand clarity on whether sales growth can absorb the extra stock.
-186.21%
A negative yoy AP change means the firm is paying down supplier credit. Benjamin Graham would see it as lowering short-term liabilities if revenue is stable.
-117.46%
A negative yoy shift in other WC might free up cash flow. Benjamin Graham would confirm the items are not essential to operations or revenue generation.
-44.01%
A negative yoy shift in other non-cash items can lower reported volatility. Benjamin Graham would confirm it is not concealing real operational costs or artificially inflating net income.
-167.58%
Negative yoy CFO growth indicates a decline in core cash generation. Benjamin Graham would treat it as a serious warning unless cyclical factors explain it.
58.79%
CapEx above 15% yoy – Significant. Philip Fisher would demand strong evidence of high-ROI projects to offset the spending.
97.39%
Acquisition spending above 15% yoy – Aggressive M&A approach. Philip Fisher would demand evidence the acquisitions truly enhance shareholder value.
-34.31%
A negative yoy shift can boost short-term liquidity if no prime investments appear. Benjamin Graham would consider it wise if safer returns do not exist.
36.79%
Proceeds growth above 30% yoy – Significant inflow. Warren Buffett would verify if it is opportunistic liquidation or a sign of pulling out from less profitable ventures.
-97.39%
A negative yoy shift can free up liquidity if expansions or intangible items are cut back. Benjamin Graham would see it as beneficial for near-term returns unless it hampers growth.
15.95%
Above 15% yoy – Heavy. Philip Fisher would require evidence these invests drive future returns and do not hamper free cash flow too much.
-20.46%
A negative yoy figure indicates less repayment or possibly new debt issuance. Benjamin Graham would see rising leverage as a red flag unless expansions have strong returns.
-41.03%
A negative yoy figure could mean fewer or no new shares or even net buybacks. Benjamin Graham would see it as positive unless expansions need capital that internal cash cannot provide.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.