PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
226.29 - 230.79
161.38 - 242.52
38.50M / 42.21M (Avg.)
34.73 | 6.57
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
6.43%
Net income growth 5-10% – Moderate. Peter Lynch would look for expansions or new product lines to accelerate profit gains.
4.28%
D&A up to 5% yoy – Manageable. Seth Klarman would see normal expansions if revenue justifies the extra depreciation.
-94.21%
A negative yoy change in deferred tax might cut future liabilities. Benjamin Graham would verify whether real tax payments are simply being recognized sooner.
-10.23%
Negative yoy SBC growth reduces new equity issuance. Benjamin Graham would verify that enough talent investment remains for growth.
-134.67%
A negative yoy change in working capital can free up cash. Benjamin Graham would confirm it is not from falling demand or asset disposal.
134.97%
Receivables above 15% yoy – Alarm for possible major collection issues. Philip Fisher would investigate if revenue recognition is artificially boosted.
157.26%
Inventory above 15% yoy – Large spike. Philip Fisher would demand clarity on whether sales growth can absorb the extra stock.
-193.97%
A negative yoy AP change means the firm is paying down supplier credit. Benjamin Graham would see it as lowering short-term liabilities if revenue is stable.
-56.36%
A negative yoy shift in other WC might free up cash flow. Benjamin Graham would confirm the items are not essential to operations or revenue generation.
-10.93%
A negative yoy shift in other non-cash items can lower reported volatility. Benjamin Graham would confirm it is not concealing real operational costs or artificially inflating net income.
-124.51%
Negative yoy CFO growth indicates a decline in core cash generation. Benjamin Graham would treat it as a serious warning unless cyclical factors explain it.
9.93%
CapEx 5-10% yoy – Noticeable. Peter Lynch would see if revenue growth or competitive advantages justify the extra outlay.
94.95%
Acquisition spending above 15% yoy – Aggressive M&A approach. Philip Fisher would demand evidence the acquisitions truly enhance shareholder value.
53.20%
Above 20% yoy – Large jump. Philip Fisher would demand clarity on the risk/return of tying up major liquidity in investments.
0.26%
Proceeds growth 0-5% yoy – Slight. Howard Marks would suspect limited sales or maturities, not a major strategic move.
324.11%
Above 20% yoy – Large jump. Philip Fisher would demand clarity on whether these “other” items overshadow core expansions.
62.54%
Above 15% yoy – Heavy. Philip Fisher would require evidence these invests drive future returns and do not hamper free cash flow too much.
40.53%
Debt repayment growth above 20% yoy – Strong deleveraging. Warren Buffett would see improved balance sheet health unless expansions are starved.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.