23.68 - 23.68
20.75 - 25.07
1.4K / 5.9K (Avg.)
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
0.05%
Cash & equivalents yoy growth 0-5% – slight improvement. Peter Lynch would verify if this aligns with revenue trends and if working capital remains healthy.
-0.26%
Declining short-term investments could free up capital but reduces near-liquid buffer. Philip Fisher would examine if this supports growth or signals cash constraints.
0.05%
Cash + STI yoy growth 0-5% – slight gain. Peter Lynch would verify if the firm's operational cash flow sustains normal expansions.
-12.08%
Declining receivables is generally positive, indicating better collections. Benjamin Graham would verify revenue stability alongside the reduction.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.63%
Declining current assets may signal efficient working capital or liquidity concerns. Benjamin Graham would investigate the composition of the decline.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.83%
Declining total intangibles reduces balance sheet risk. Seth Klarman would see this as improving asset quality.
0.38%
Growth 0-5% yoy – slight change. Peter Lynch wonders if the firm is cautious or sees limited investment opportunities.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.26%
Declining other non-current assets simplifies the balance sheet. Seth Klarman would favor this reduction in complexity.
0.26%
Growth 0-5% yoy – slight. Peter Lynch might see it as conservative expansion or replacement-level spending.
-0.71%
Declining other assets reduces balance sheet complexity. Benjamin Graham would see this as improving transparency.
-0.45%
Declining total assets may signal asset sales or strategic downsizing. Seth Klarman would investigate the strategic rationale.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-11.28%
Declining long-term debt reduces leverage risk. Howard Marks would see this as improving financial stability.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
14.41%
Up to 20% yoy – a noticeable rise. Howard Marks questions if future tax liabilities might weigh on returns.
8.93%
Up to 10% yoy – some increase. Howard Marks questions if new obligations are well-covered by cash flow.
-8.93%
Declining total non-current liabilities reduces long-term leverage risk. Benjamin Graham would see this as strengthening the balance sheet.
-0.22%
Declining other liabilities simplifies the balance sheet. Seth Klarman would favor this reduction in complexity and unknown obligations.
-0.40%
Declining total liabilities strengthens the balance sheet. Howard Marks would see this as reducing financial risk.
0.46%
Up to 5% yoy – small issuance. Howard Marks asks if new capital is used productively.
11.19%
10-20% yoy – healthy expansion in retained earnings. Warren Buffett sees it as fueling future growth.
-60.24%
Declining AOCI may indicate reduced unrealized gains or currency losses. Howard Marks would see this as potentially reducing volatility.
-8.26%
Declining other equity items simplifies the capital structure. Benjamin Graham would favor this reduction in complexity.
-1.48%
Declining stockholders equity may signal losses or large distributions. Seth Klarman would investigate the underlying causes and sustainability.
-0.45%
Declining total capital may indicate asset sales or poor capital allocation. Howard Marks would investigate strategic implications.
0.10%
0-5% yoy – slight change. Peter Lynch sees a cautious approach or fewer opportunities.
-11.28%
Declining total debt reduces leverage risk. Seth Klarman would see this as improving financial stability and flexibility.
-22.89%
Declining net debt indicates improving liquidity or deleveraging. Howard Marks would see this as strengthening financial position.